|
"The Court found the testimony of the Debtor's expert more persuasive, [ValueNomics'] Jones had better credentials and experience than [the opposing expert]. His testimony was more
convincing.
Moreover, Jones had considerable experience valuing high tech companies while [the opposing expert] had virtually none. Finally, Jones spent much more time evaluating the Debtor, including by interviewing personnel of the Debtor and other people knowledgeable about the industry. "
|